VSE knjižnice (vzajemna bibliografsko-kataložna baza podatkov COBIB.SI)
  • Knowledge and conditionals of (dis)connection
    Šuster, Danilo
    The gist of modal epistemology is expressed in the idea that you fail to know if you do believe truly but it is seriously possible for you to believe falsely. According to subjunctivism, this idea is ... captured by certain subjunctive conditionals. One formulation invokes a safety condition -- If S had believed P, then P would have been the case, "while the other invokes a sensitivity condition -- "If P had been false, S would not have believed that P." According to simple subjunctivism, such conditionals do not contrapose and Sosa derives important epistemological consequences which favor safety from this difference. However, simple subjunctivism is inadequate. I return to Goodman and his analysis of factuals and propose modal stability, which is restricted sensitivity or enhanced safety as a proper epistemic condition for the non-accidental connection between the basis for the belief and the relevant facts of the matter. The idea of modal stability combines robustness (benefi ts of safety) with responsiveness to facts (benefi ts of sensitivity) and recovers the original motivation for the relevant alternatives theory -- when testing for claims of knowledge that p we ask what might be the case if not-p, but we ignore irrelevant possibilities. Epistemic modal conditions should be expressed in terms of conditionals of connection which contrapose within the limits of relevance.
    Vir: Croatian journal of philosophy. - ISSN 1333-1108 (Vol. 15, no. 45, 2015, str. 267-293)
    Vrsta gradiva - članek, sestavni del ; neleposlovje za odrasle
    Leto - 2015
    Jezik - angleški
    COBISS.SI-ID - 22004744

vir: Croatian journal of philosophy. - ISSN 1333-1108 (Vol. 15, no. 45, 2015, str. 267-293)
loading ...
loading ...
loading ...

Vnos na polico