VSE knjižnice (vzajemna bibliografsko-kataložna baza podatkov COBIB.SI)
  • From Li Zehou to Kant and back, or the precarious relation between apriorism and empiricism
    Rošker, Jana S.
    We may describe Li Zehou and Henry Rosemont as examples of philoso- phers whose not just “compare.” Yet, there is a specific sense in which Li ‘s texts may still appear as “Chinese philosophy” and ... Rosemont’s as “American.” This causes difficulties which Jana Rošker’s paper meditates on. The thinkers discussed in this volume might be “beyond comparison,” but distinctive cultural elements remain. Many “comparative” interpretations of Li Zehou, Rošker argues, are methodologi- cally Western, but are still informed by traditional Chinese ideas. Specifically, she describes how Li Zehou interacts with Kant. Li’s work as a “process of transforming the empirical into the transcendental can be seen as a kind of synthesis of empiri- cism and rationalism.” This is, of course, problematic. Rošker summarizes: “Kant’s system is completely incompatible with Li Zehou’s philosophy.” However, the latter still engages productively with the former through what Rošker calls the process of “the sublation of philosophy.” If we respect differences and understand comparisons in this way, we better understand both Li’s thought and comparative philosophy.
    Vir: Four exemplars of Ru 儒 (Confucianism) : beyond comparative philosophy (Str. 111-123)
    Vrsta gradiva - članek, sestavni del ; neleposlovje za odrasle
    Leto - 2025
    Jezik - angleški
    COBISS.SI-ID - 244688643

    Povezava(-e):

    Repozitorij Univerze v Ljubljani – RUL
    DOI

Vnos na polico